skip to main content

Nealon and Hallam v the United Kingdom (App nos 32483/19 and 35049/19) [2023]

The challenge

An application to the European Court of Human Rights was made by the applicants in respect of a refusal of their claims for compensation for a miscarriage of justice under section 133(1ZA) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, after their convictions had been quashed.

The NIHRC was granted leave to intervene by way of written submissions.

The NIHRC’s submissions were based on the application of Article 14(6) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), highlighting the UN Human Rights Committee’s recommendations to the UK Government to review the new test for miscarriage of justice with a view of ensuring its compatibility with the ICCPR. It further highlighted the particular context of Northern Ireland and the disproportionate impact on those applicants who are required to establish a newly established fact to demonstrate innocence.

Human rights engaged

The applicants argued that s.133(1ZA) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 was in breach of Article 6(2) European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in that the test required them to prove their innocence in order to be eligible for compensation.

Access the ECHR here.

Outcome

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held there to be no violation of Article 6(2) ECHR.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×